Go Back   Pet forum for dogs cats and humans - Pets.ca > Discussion Groups - mainly cats and dogs > Breed characteristics and traits > Breed bans - BSL - Pit Bull bans

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 8th, 2004, 10:40 PM
hounds003 hounds003 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 125
BSL-Bill 132 update

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Candice O'Connell <mailto:nccpd@sympatico.ca>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 1:58 PM
> Permission to cross post
> November 7,
> 2004 ;
> INFORMATION Bulletin No. 2004-03
> bill 132 - update
> On November 4, 2004, Michael Bryant, Attorney General, moved for
> second reading of Bill 132 and opened debate. Anyone wishing to read
> the transcript of the debate can find it at
> http://hansardindex.ontla.on.ca/hans.../38-1/l084.htm at para.
> 1600
> <http://hansardindex.ontla.on.ca/hansardeissue/38-1/l084.htm%20at%20para.%201600>.
> Debate will continue on November 15th. Bryant has promised that
> public hearings will be held.
> As mentioned previously, Bill 132 is a seriously flawed piece of
> legislation and it is essentially that we take every measure to ensure
> that it is defeated. Clearly, we must deal with the issue of all
> dangerous dogs but there are more effective measures that can be
> implemented.
> After meeting with other organizations and individuals at a NOAH
> meeting on November 1, 2004, the NCCPD has decided to take action in
> accordance with the following:
> 1. The NCCPD is organizing a peaceful demonstration to take place
> on November 28, 1:00 to 4:00 p.m. The theme of this symbolic walk is
> The walk will start at Provincial Court House at 161
> Elgin Street, proceed to Parliament Hill and then on to the
> Supreme Court of Canada. We will have several speakers and
> participants will receive information on the ramifications of
> Bill 132 and planned challenges by the Dog Legislation Council
> of Canada if the legislation is passed. We want to make
> demonstration a huge success and send a message to the
> Government that the legislation is unacceptable. A copy of the
> demonstration flyer is on the NCCPD website and can be
> downloaded. Please help to spread the word about this event by
> passing the information on to your friends, relatives, and those
> on your e-mail lists. If you are out of town but within driving
> distance, see if you can organize a bus trip to Ottawa.
> Remember parking is free everywhere downtown on Sundays.
> 2. The NCCPD will launch a mass e-mail campaign. Every few days,
> the NCCPD will select on or two MPPs and send an e-mail to the members
> and supporters providing the names and e-mail address of the MPPs to
> be targetted. We will also provide sample text which can cut, pasted
> and sent in an e-mail to the selected MPPs. People may also opt to
> provide their own message or comments. We will ask everyone to cross
> post and disseminate widely.
> We have been told by a reliable source that the MPPs are divided on
> Bill 132 and that many are nervous about the ramifications of passing
> this legislation, particularly those with political aspirations. In
> addition, we have been advised that if sufficient pressure is applied
> on the MPPs, including those in the Conservative and NDP parties, this
> legislation can be stopped.
> The NCCPD believes that it is essential to take the above action to
> demonstrate to the Ontario Government that it is unacceptable. We
> believe that there are better alternatives to deal with dangerous
> dogs, including those proposed by the National Companion Animal
> Coalition, see copy on the NCCPD website.
> The organization of a demonstration is a huge undertaking and we need
> your help in several areas as follows:
> 1. Walk Marshals: These are volunteers that help ensure that the
> participants are walking where they should. They will also provide
> information or assistance to the participants if needed. The City of
> Ottawa is providing police assistance to direct traffic and implement
> road closures if the turnout is high.
> 2. Logistics: We will be setting up tents, tables and a public
> address system at the Supreme Court Building on Wellington. We will
> need people to help set up and tear down. Tippet Richardson has
> donated a truck to transport everything.
> 3. General: We will need people to hand out information, get
> signatures on a petition, accept donations, etc.
> There are two MPPs that have put polls on their respective websites
> seeking views about breed banning. Please visit these websites and
> register your opinion.
> 1. John Yakabuski, at
> http://www.johnyakabuski.com/survey/poll.asp. When last checked there
> were 1875 registered votes with approximately 78% voting against the
> ban and support more owner responsibility.
> 2. Bob Runciman, acting leader of the opposition has a poll at
> http://www.lgprovpc.ca/. Scroll down to the bottom left and register
> your opinion.
> The following was sent in a previous e-mail but it warrants
> repeating. The legislation goes beyond banning breeds.
> 1. It broadenspolice powersso that, with or without a
> warrant, police may enter a person's home on hearsay or a
> complaint from a neighbour and seize a dog, regardless of
> breed. 2. The legislation fails to include "with
> provocation" as part of the criteria for determining if a
> dog's behaviour was inappropriate, regardless of breed.
> The owner is left with only the defense of having
> exercised due diligence should an incident occur.
> Subsequently, a criminal could conceivably break into your
> home and if your dog defends you or the property, you
> could be fined. A fine of up to $10, 000 is being
> considered. 3. You may be fined if your dog is accused
> of menacing behaviour. Menacing behaviour could merely be
> a dog barking and bobbing along its fence line. There is
> no definition for menacing behaviour in this Bill. 4.
> Section 19 states that it is incumbent upon the owner to
> prove the lineage of his/her dog. There is no means for
> an owner to prove that dog of an unknown breed mix is a
> certain breed mix. This would be subjective at best,
> require the owner to hire a veterinarian to appear in
> court, something veterinarians do not have the time to do,
> and then hope that the testimony given by that
> veterinarian is better than the testimony heard from the
> Crown's expert witness.5. If you read between the lines,
> Mr. Bryant's "solution" for the volume of restricted dogs
> that would be surrendered to local animal control
> facilities is to broaden the scope of the Animal Research
> Act.
> 6. Mr. Bryant's Bill C-132 discriminates against responsible pet
> owners in this province.
> Finally, we will keep you posted as information becomes available.
> Best regards,
> Candice O'Connell
> Chairperson
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2004, 11:04 PM
hounds003 hounds003 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 125

Sorry I didn't realize this was already posted!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Terms of Use

  • All Bulletin Board Posts are for personal/non-commercial use only.
  • Self-promotion and/or promotion in general is prohibited.
  • Debate is healthy but profane and deliberately rude posts will be deleted.
  • Posters not following the rules will be banned at the Admins' discretion.
  • Read the Full Forum Rules

Forum Details

  • Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
    Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
    vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise (Reduced on this page: MySQL 0%).
  • All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.