Go Back   Pet forum for dogs cats and humans - Pets.ca > In the News - Pet related articles and stories in the press > Newspaper Articles of Interest (animal/pet related) from Around the World

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 22nd, 2012, 08:33 AM
marko's Avatar
marko marko is offline
Administrator - Pet lover
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Montreal Quebec Canada
Posts: 11,124
Abused and abandoned pets: Will Montrealís $23 million change anything?

There is also a podcast at the end http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/201...ange-anything/

In the caption under the picture they suggest this person is helping after a puppy mill bust....THAT's the bigger issue imo.

A shiny new building is a band-aid. Yeah a shiny 23 million dollar building is good I guess....but it won't help Quebec from continuing to remain the puppy mill capital of Canada. Not a thing.
__________________
Please tactfully EDUCATE or IGNORE posters you don't agree with.
Please PM me & Include URLs and post #'s for any issues and it's my pleasure to help.
I'm firm - but fair. Mind the Rules and enjoy your stay.
Newcomers FAQ - How do I post on this BB?
Pet facebook group
Check out the Pet podcast
Follow me on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 22nd, 2012, 10:51 AM
Loki Love's Avatar
Loki Love Loki Love is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rigaud, QC
Posts: 479
I do think it's a step in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 22nd, 2012, 11:35 AM
marko's Avatar
marko marko is offline
Administrator - Pet lover
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Montreal Quebec Canada
Posts: 11,124
A 23 million dollar building for pets is a good thing.

Hard to say it isn't a good thing as jobs will be created and abandoned pets have a newer place to hang when their owners dispose of them.

But quebec has a problem. it has a reputation for being a terrible place for pets. If you were an abandoned animal you would never choose Quebec as your hope because all of the other provinces are better choices.

We need to EDUCATE quebecers on animal welfare and animal suffering. We need to make Quebecers feel PROUD about being the best province for pets. We need to get Quebecers to be MORE disgusted when they come across the relentless animal cruelty in the form of puppy/kitten mills.

There are many issues that Quebec leads on with regard to social welfare and progressive thinking. The 23 million would have been better spent on education imo.
__________________
Please tactfully EDUCATE or IGNORE posters you don't agree with.
Please PM me & Include URLs and post #'s for any issues and it's my pleasure to help.
I'm firm - but fair. Mind the Rules and enjoy your stay.
Newcomers FAQ - How do I post on this BB?
Pet facebook group
Check out the Pet podcast
Follow me on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 24th, 2012, 01:16 PM
woofendog woofendog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brossard Quebec
Posts: 65
Angry Proposed Montreal Bylaw

The city of Montreal needs to call in outside experts from the other provinces and the United States. As long as they don't deal with the source of the problem (selling of unsterilized pets in pet stores and over the internet) this problem of abondoned pets will continue. This bylaw also proposes putting a limit (2 dogs and 2 cats) on the number of pets permitted per private dwelling. Many responsible pet owners are able to handle more than the four pet maximum in their "private" dwellings. If these pets become a nuisance to the neighbors, then this problem can be dealt with under existing nuisance bylaws. The SPCA Montreal is also against placing a limit on pet ownership. Someone has to take in the abondoned stray animals and keep them out of the neighbors' gardens. Then there is the proposed licensing fees for cats. This extra cost will only discourage people from taking in stray cats and may lead to some people abondoning their pets. We, the people, who take in abondoned cats, sterilize them, keep them indoors and provide them with loving forever homes are not part of the problem but rather are part of the solution. The government is part of the problem for refusing to deal with the source of the problem. No mention of whether this proposed bylaw will contain a grandfather clause. Imagine a government official telling you that you have to give up one of your pets. It would be better that they give the twenty three million dollars to local SPCA'S and vet clinics to provide for low cost spay/neuter and trap/release programs in the local municipalities. Now if we could come up with a politician control bylaw to deal with our major corruption problems.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Terms of Use

  • All Bulletin Board Posts are for personal/non-commercial use only.
  • Self-promotion and/or promotion in general is prohibited.
  • Debate is healthy but profane and deliberately rude posts will be deleted.
  • Posters not following the rules will be banned at the Admins' discretion.
  • Read the Full Forum Rules

Forum Details

  • Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
    vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise (Reduced on this page: MySQL 0%).
  • All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.