Go Back   Pet forum for dogs cats and humans - Pets.ca > Discussion Groups - mainly cats and dogs > On topic - Pet chat, opinions, feelings and rants > Pet Stories - anecdotes - jokes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th, 2004, 08:57 AM
deerclan's Avatar
deerclan deerclan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: brampton
Posts: 311
Bad pet owners could face year in jail

Copied this from the Toronto Sun

DeerClan

OFFICIALS IN an Arkansas city are considering fining pet owners up to $1,000 US and jailing them for a year if they fail to pick up their stray dogs or cats after six days -- the same penalties as someone convicted of negligent homicide. While the city says the suggested ordinance tracks with state law, pet owners say it is excessive.

"I think jail time may be a little severe. What if you're on vacation and someone else is taking care of your dog when it leaves?" dog owner Kathy Jones said.

Under the ordinance, pet owners could be cited for animal abandonment on the seventh day of impoundment.

James Willett, director of code enforcement for the city, said the proposed ordinance mirrors the state's law against cruelty to animals regarding animal abandonment. He said fines would likely be lower.

"The judge is going to make the determining factor; nothing is set in stone. It's like shoplifting or driving while intoxicated. People who get DWIs get less than the maximum fine," Willett said.
__________________
http://badenwillcocks.ca
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 28th, 2004, 09:37 AM
mastifflover's Avatar
mastifflover mastifflover is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,007
This would be a great law to have passed for lousy pet owners.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 28th, 2004, 10:36 AM
glasslass's Avatar
glasslass glasslass is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calif.
Posts: 4,679
Thumbs up

"Could be sited" is the key here. Extenuating circumstances, I'm sure, would be taken into consideration if the pet owner was away and someone else taking care of the pet. But it does give a means to go after those abusers that flaunt their irresponsibility repeatedly.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 28th, 2004, 10:43 AM
heidiho's Avatar
heidiho heidiho is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maui,Hawaii
Posts: 4,348
I Love It.......................
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 28th, 2004, 11:00 AM
Cinnabear Cinnabear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 748
It's about time. Hopefully the money will go directly to these shelters that houses and feeds them. Hopefully people will start to think about what it truly means to be a pet owner, not dropping them off out of nowhere. Pets are not disposable like garbage.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 28th, 2004, 11:08 AM
glasslass's Avatar
glasslass glasslass is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calif.
Posts: 4,679
Now, if only they'd up the penalties for those that abuse animals!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 29th, 2004, 11:51 PM
krdahmer's Avatar
krdahmer krdahmer is offline
~Cat Servent~
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario
Posts: 5,229
Hmmmm....

but the question is do you really want an irresponsible pet owner to be forced to keep or pick up an animal they don't want or can't take care of? I think that may open up for a whole new set of problems (neglect/ possible abuse). I guess you would just have to take it case by case.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 12th, 2004, 10:43 AM
Babs Babs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 138
Very good news. Let's hope the idea spreads.

Think about it this way:

Most cities for Licensing purposes require a dog to be microchipped. When a pet is microchipped, it is their responsibility to provide proper care for the animal. In addition, improper sale or transfer of the pet would require them to register the sale/transfer with the local licensing office.

I would even take this a step further:

Only certified breeders and authorized pet dealers are allowed to sell dogs, or register transfers of dogs. This would restrict "backyard breeding" severely. Routine inspections should be done in suspected cases of backyard breeding, and unlicensed ownership of dogs.

That being said, there will be fewer homeless puppies, and fewer cases of irresponsible ownership.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 12th, 2004, 11:35 AM
mastifflover's Avatar
mastifflover mastifflover is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,007
I hope that does spread it is a great idea. I love the fact that you could in time put BYB's and Puppy mills out of business or at least decrease the amount drastically.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 13th, 2004, 09:05 AM
Babs Babs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 138
I have to comment on this as well,
"I think jail time may be a little severe. What if you're on vacation and someone else is taking care of your dog when it leaves?" dog owner Kathy Jones said.
Is that to say then, that if someone places their child with another person to watch while they are at work, and that child wanders off, someone is not blamed? Obviously the daycare person would be blamed, but they would investigate the parental choice for that person as well. If the daycare person wasn't certified or licenced to provide care, officials would want to know why parents chose that person.

It's a good question, but it does open an arena for another set of questions. Ultimately it is the responsibility for an owner to find responsible care for their animals when they are gone.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 13th, 2004, 09:38 AM
Writing4Fun's Avatar
Writing4Fun Writing4Fun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,421
This woman asked "What if you're on vacation?". If you're on vacation, then the person looking after your pet will be responsible, and they should get whatever punishment is legislated. However, I doubt that every abandoned animal in shelters all over the globe had owners who were on vacation (unless you consider that their brains had taken permanent vacations from the rest of their bodies!).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 8th, 2004, 10:37 PM
tayab's Avatar
tayab tayab is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12
Great idea. I hope it catches on nation wide. The thought of monies collect from fines go to animal shelters is a wonderful idea as well
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Terms of Use

  • All Bulletin Board Posts are for personal/non-commercial use only.
  • Self-promotion and/or promotion in general is prohibited.
  • Debate is healthy but profane and deliberately rude posts will be deleted.
  • Posters not following the rules will be banned at the Admins' discretion.
  • Read the Full Forum Rules

Forum Details

  • Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
    vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise (Reduced on this page: MySQL 10.00%).
  • All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.