Resource Guarding - Humans

[Blackdog22]

http://http://flyingdogpress.com/artlibreg.htm

Read ALL of the articles if you can....
Some of them are really witty and interesting to read.

If you cant read them all I suggest these:

http://flyingdogpress.com/candy.html

http://http://flyingdogpress.com/attitude.html


http://http://flyingdogpress.com/observe.html

I will just PM info on the NILF as I can't find the article I want right at this moment.

[Blackdog22]

...and thanks for the kind words guys!

[BenMax]

Thanks Blackdog22 - I will dig in and inform myself.

Cheers to you.

[BenMax]

Originally Posted by Blackdog22

...and thanks for the kind words guys!

You totally deserve it. If only I was as wise as you at that age...I would be on top of the world. You are a smart young person.

[aslan]

dont know if this is the one blackdog is talking about but it is NILF training.

www.dogo.org/Education/NILF.htm

[BenMax]

Reading this Aslan - then I can so identify. This is what I teach and believe. So I guess I am a NILFie.

Thanks as I will continue to read what Blackdog22 has also posted.

[Love4himies]

Oh curleetop, you new dog is beautiful . How nice of you to take this dog in.

[K9 Love]

Originally Posted by aslan

K9 love if you would like to have a personal conversation with benmax that is what the pm system is for not the op's thread. I don't believe any one mentioned negative reinforcement.

I would only assume that when someone labels a method used (which is in fact not even true) as a member, then claims another method does not "pussy foot" around, that the first method is to be assumed as pussy footing. Would you not agree?

There are two different kind's of methods, Fifi's and one that WORKS. Would you not think that I'm implying Fifi's method does not in fact work? Perhaps I've assumed this and made a you know what out of you know who, but to me the inference was clear.

[aslan]

Originally Posted by K9 Love

I would only assume that when someone labels a method used (which is in fact not even true) as a member, then claims another method does not "pussy foot" around, that the first method is to be assumed as pussy footing. Would you not agree?

There are two different kind's of methods, Fifi's and one that WORKS. Would you not think that I'm implying Fifi's method does not in fact work? Perhaps I've assumed this and made a you know what out of you know who, but to me the inference was clear.

again this is what the pm system is for.

[Ford]

If any member would like to bring up a point made in the public forum, that is certainly their right. If another member has an issue with it, then they should either put them on ignore, or bring it up with a mod/admin.

Your friendly neighbourhood mod,
Ford

[BenMax]

My sincere apologies for anyone offended. Perhaps next time I will proof read what I write in order to not insinuate that anyone's method is of question.

Rightfully so however a PM would have rectified the situation and would not have escalated or left ill feelings.

Now back to topic - I am so curious how everything is going. Please keep us advised. Thanks.

[marko]

As with most teaching there are always different styles and methods and these are likely to be useful to this OP and future visitors to this thread.
So long as nobody is whacking a dog like they used to do years ago, different training methods are likely to prove useful in this and other situations and I think people like to read them.

Just wanted to add that.

Thanks Everyone - Marko