|
|
View Poll Results: has your pet developed cancer,what have you been feeding for the last year or more? ? | |||
click if your pet has had cancer and you've been feeding kibble | 9 | 32.14% | |
your pet has had cancer and you've been feeding canned. | 0 | 0% | |
your pet has had cancer and you've been feeding raw | 1 | 3.57% | |
your pet has never had cancer and you've been feeding kibble | 13 | 46.43% | |
your pet has never had cancer and you're feeding canned | 1 | 3.57% | |
your pet has never had cancer and you've been feeding raw | 4 | 14.29% | |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just because the EPA has not classified chlorine as to its human carcinogenicity, does not mean there are no links to cancer - In the chlorination process itself, chlorine naturally combines with natural available organic matter decaying vegetation to form potent cancer causing trihalomethanes (THM’s) and/or haloforms. This is a well known dangerous process and the EPA has been cautioned of this since 1920. The amount of THM's is apparently 'regulated" by the EPA, although the maximum amount allowed by law is 100 ppb, a 1976 study showed 31 of 112 municipal water systems exceeded this limit. IN 1986 the EPA itself issued a guideline that if one lives in an area with chlorinated water, NOT to drink it. I can't believe what I'm reading here. Right now one of the leading causes of cancer in women is chlorine. Anyways, let's agree to disagree on that one. Keep drinking chlorinated water then! Here's a good read. Breast Cancer and Chlorine Fact Sheet http://www.breastcancerfund.org/site...XLdPaE&b=84502
__________________
www.MerlinsHope.com Last edited by MerlinsHope; March 9th, 2008 at 05:52 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|