Go Back   Pet forum for dogs cats and humans - Pets.ca > Discussion Groups - mainly cats and dogs > Dog food forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 16th, 2009, 02:01 AM
rainbow's Avatar
rainbow rainbow is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Beautiful BC's Kootenay Country
Posts: 34,759
Angry Happy Hounds Dog Food

Pet food company admits using dead livestock in their food.


http://www.truthaboutpetfood.com/art...ood/Page1.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 16th, 2009, 02:47 AM
Melei'sMom's Avatar
Melei'sMom Melei'sMom is offline
ZooKeeper aka Mom
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Penticton, BC
Posts: 374
That is just gross

have to admit to a moron moment though... when I first read your comment about using dead animals, my first thought was "I hope so! live animals thrown in a grinder would be so mean!" lol, sometimes I really am an idiot
__________________
Women are angels, and when someone breaks our wings . . .
We simply continue to fly . . .On a broomstick.
We are flexible like that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 16th, 2009, 09:31 AM
ownedbycats's Avatar
ownedbycats ownedbycats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 853
You're not a moron, Melei's Mom, my first thought was "I certainly hope those animals were dead 1st" too.
__________________
Dr. Seuss~DLH (brother's cat)~June 2007-
Misty~DSH (my cat & Mooby's mom)-?- Sept. 15, 2014
MooBoots(Mooby) ~ DMH(Mom's cat)~July 21, 2008-
Sunshine~ Golden retriever X white german sheperd (Dad's dog)~October 24, 2008-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 16th, 2009, 10:30 PM
cell cell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 586
I give the company credit for OPENLY admitting to what goes into their food rather then hiding it as most companies do. No one can claim ignorance or ill informed decision making if this food is selected.
I don't see how it is disgusting they admit their meat source, since using rendered meat in pet food production is more common then people know or care to think about.
I would preffer all food companies were forced to include the source of the meat used in their food and the percentage of rendered meat.
The article states the rendering plant uses dead livestock which may have incurred some degree of nutritional loss due to degredation, this rendered meat source is still superior to some rendering sources that use euthanised animals, road kill and other randoms.
Since the article does not state what denaturants are added to the food research can't be looked into as to the effects of that denaturant, and if it is natural or not. With all the pet food scandels that have been happening, with plastics and chemicals being used to disguise protein content of food, choosing a food where you know where the protein source is from might still be better then ingredients that the company itself doesn't know the contents of.
It all comes down to consumer choice, people buy the food even knowing what goes into it, so it will still sell, but keeping consumers in the dark still sells more...

Last edited by cell; December 16th, 2009 at 10:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Terms of Use

  • All Bulletin Board Posts are for personal/non-commercial use only.
  • Self-promotion and/or promotion in general is prohibited.
  • Debate is healthy but profane and deliberately rude posts will be deleted.
  • Posters not following the rules will be banned at the Admins' discretion.
  • Read the Full Forum Rules

Forum Details

  • Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
    vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise (Reduced on this page: MySQL 0%).
  • All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.