View Single Post
Old April 21st, 2010, 10:04 AM
Chris21711 Chris21711 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Queensville, Ontario
Posts: 8,992
Originally Posted by hazelrunpack View Post

I doubt that anyone was defending cruelty to animals, Chris. The Court looks at the law with a broader eye, trying to determine unintended consequences to the way it's written. It wasn't the subject matter, but the wording that came into question.

If it spurs the crafting of a tighter, more restrictive and effective law, the ruling will be a good thing. Often, when the Court overturns something, new laws spring up that handle the problem better. Let's hope this turns out to be another case like that
I understand that Hazel, but they take so damn long in recrafting anything that the "sickos" get to carry on their merry way.
Reply With Quote