Pets.ca - Pet forum for dogs cats and humans 

-->

I just can't believe this article

erykah1310
April 14th, 2011, 09:47 PM
I can't believe this article/blog. Hasn't been any bully news lately so lets let reporters blog about them for hits
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2011/04/chow-comes-prepared-for-the-pitbull.html

Shaykeija
April 14th, 2011, 11:22 PM
OK so that poor unfortunate person is mental deficient. In little words. She has no brain. May the next door she knocks on be infested with flying monkeys and big a$$ed bedbugs. What a :loser:

mikischo
April 15th, 2011, 06:46 AM
I don't see anywhere in the article where the woman had any issues whatsoever about the dog. As a matter of fact, she is an animal lover who has campaigned for the regulation of pet foods in Canada.

I see the views in the story as being strictly that of the reporter, James Cudmore. I have no idea why he chose to write such a ridiculous article but if he wanted to score some points with his readers he obviously missed the mark, judging from the majority of the comments to the article. I got quite a chuckle out of some of the comments and rated most of them up.

Love4himies
April 15th, 2011, 07:01 AM
It never ceases to amaze me how ridiculous journalists can be :frustrated:

Melinda
April 15th, 2011, 07:48 AM
I don't get it?:shrug: is it not a good article? is he not saying that even though the dog was built like a body builder but was really nice and was changing his mind about pitbull=trouble and book=cover? I must be missing something.

Mirela
April 15th, 2011, 08:46 AM
My take is that even thought the dog was extremely well behaved, the owner totally in control and Ms. Chow completely at ease with the dog, the guy who wrote the article still couldn't get over his bias against the dog, based solely on looks and preconception.

Off-topic (sorta') - I understand that it probably was a slow news day but why oh why didn't he just yakk about the weather instead????

Love4himies
April 15th, 2011, 08:48 AM
My take is that even thought the dog was extremely well behaved, the owner totally in control and Ms. Chow completely at ease with the dog, the guy who wrote the article still couldn't get over his bias against the dog, based solely on looks and preconception.



That's how I took it too.

Melinda
April 15th, 2011, 08:48 AM
journalists usually have multiple stories written and a lot of times, believe it or not, the editor will send out a mass email asking for any article that is in the top 25 "active interest" list to be sent to him to fill a certain size space in a newspaper....

Frenchy
April 15th, 2011, 10:55 AM
I don't get it?:shrug: is it not a good article? is he not saying that even though the dog was built like a body builder but was really nice and was changing his mind about pitbull=trouble and book=cover? I must be missing something.

Same here Melinda , I read it twice , saw nothing wrong with the article. :shrug: Then again , you always have people feeling attacked , screaming bloody murder as soon as "Pitbulls" are mention.

the owner totally in control


quoted from the article :

"He forced his way out the door and into the hall"

not too much control there.

mummummum
April 15th, 2011, 10:59 AM
I know this dog personally and Rocky's owner very, very well. Olivia Chow knows Rocky very well too. Nothing in this article is as it actually happened. Other than Rocky's famous slobbery kisses that is. The article is yet another example of extreme bias and incredibly irresponsible non-journalism ONCE AGAIN.

Melinda
April 15th, 2011, 11:04 AM
the article was probably edited two ways to sunday, my son will have his articles in the ottawa citizen and have roughly 1,500 words cut out each time.

mummummum
April 15th, 2011, 11:12 AM
OK so that poor unfortunate person is mental deficient. In little words. She has no brain. May the next door she knocks on be infested with flying monkeys and big a$$ed bedbugs. What a :loser:

:) Actually, she is one of the VERY few politicians I *trust*. She does what she says she's going to do. She is a passionate advocate for the poor and disenfranchised and absolutely loves animals. She and The Rockstar have a very special relationship. If I were an NDPer and in her riding I would campaign for her in a heartbeat.

No bad on you Shayk... how could you know? We tend to trust journalists a little too much ~ me too!

It's one of the more assinine non-news articles I've read. I mean, this WAS supposed to be about HER right?

Chris21711
April 15th, 2011, 11:19 AM
I'm with you on that MMM, Olivia Chow and her husband are great advocates for the needy. I would vote for either one in a heartbeat.

Love4himies
April 15th, 2011, 12:43 PM
I know this dog personally and Rocky's owner very, very well. Olivia Chow knows Rocky very well too. Nothing in this article is as it actually happened. Other than Rocky's famous slobbery kisses that is. The article is yet another example of extreme bias and incredibly irresponsible non-journalism ONCE AGAIN.

Is Rocky's owner a member here mx3?

mummummum
April 15th, 2011, 12:54 PM
Yes m'dear. BabyRocky1. She is very very busy with fighting BSL and organizing and supporting Pitbull guardians/ lovers/supporters across the world and as such, isn't able to post often. The Rockstar (Rocky) is a true *breed* ambassador.

Love4himies
April 15th, 2011, 12:56 PM
Yes m'dear. BabyRocky1. She is very very busy with fighting BSL and organizing and supporting Pitbull guardians/ lovers/supporters across the world and as such, isn't able to post often. The Rockstar (Rocky) is a true *breed* ambassador.

That's what I thought. :lovestruck:

mummummum
April 15th, 2011, 01:07 PM
In fact, here is the *vicious* pitbull with the toofies..." It wasn't that they were bared (although they were) so much as the they were attached to a giant set of muscular jaws".

73348

Love4himies
April 15th, 2011, 01:12 PM
In fact, here is the *vicious* pitbull with the toofies..." It wasn't that they were bared (although they were) so much as the they were attached to a giant set of muscular jaws".

73348

:eek: One could drown in doggy slobbers should Rocky decide to give kisses :eek:. :cloud9:.

mummummum
April 15th, 2011, 01:40 PM
I adore Rocky. He is now 12, can barely walk, has a Rockstar Mobile to get around, he has permanent scarring and almost constant bleeds on his nose owing to the muzzles yet NEVER and I mean NEVER does he cease to amaze me with his incredible patience, willingness to love, incredible good manners and...well, just look at the beauty of his soul ~ it shines in his face.

:censored:, this article makes me see red. It's so :censored: typical of the :censored: media and the :censored: politicians and the :censored: people who are naive enough to buy into the hype.

Yup... I'm primed and pumped. Thanks for posting that ERykah. Anybody need an edumecation? I'm in "the mood". :evil:

Melinda
April 15th, 2011, 01:45 PM
go get em mumX3

Luvmypitgirls
April 17th, 2011, 12:06 AM
Being a bully guardian, all I'm saying on the topic is....
Rocky has one big beautiful bully smile!:lovestruck:

erykah1310
April 17th, 2011, 09:40 AM
Does he ever :D
I've decided to leave this one alone after some comments until it was discovered who's dog was in question

Rocky is one handsome boy

Goldfields
April 17th, 2011, 10:43 AM
I think you are taking that article entirely the wrong way. It's hilarious, as he meant it to be. I laughed right through it. The way he spoke about himself is so funny, scared of a big smiley dog while two ladies weren't. LOL. What a chicken. And the slobbery tongue hanging out from between parted, slobbery teeth .... come on, he could have said much worse if he was having a shot at the breed.
Lovely smile by the way, our cattle dogs often have the muscling that enables them to smile too.

erykah1310
April 17th, 2011, 11:34 AM
But he could have mentioned it, I find it was left so vague that it could be taken either way depending on how you stand on the breed.

Love4himies
April 17th, 2011, 01:16 PM
I think you are taking that article entirely the wrong way. It's hilarious, as he meant it to be. I laughed right through it. The way he spoke about himself is so funny, scared of a big smiley dog while two ladies weren't. LOL. What a chicken. And the slobbery tongue hanging out from between parted, slobbery teeth .... come on, he could have said much worse if he was having a shot at the breed.
Lovely smile by the way, our cattle dogs often have the muscling that enables them to smile too.

Maybe you did, but with the attitude the general public here in Ontario has on pitbulls, it would have been taken as "see, pitbulls are to be feared". Pitbulls do NOT need any further negative publicity. The pic was not published with the article for people to see what a harmless dog Rocky is.

mummummum
April 17th, 2011, 02:30 PM
I think you are taking that article entirely the wrong way. It's hilarious, as he meant it to be. I laughed right through it. The way he spoke about himself is so funny, scared of a big smiley dog while two ladies weren't. LOL. What a chicken. And the slobbery tongue hanging out from between parted, slobbery teeth .... come on, he could have said much worse if he was having a shot at the breed.
Lovely smile by the way, our cattle dogs often have the muscling that enables them to smile too.

Dawg knows I tried to see it that way GF...and thank you for bringing a different perspective.

I would like to live in a province ~ a world ~ where we can one day mock absurdities such as that which you point out. But, I cannot because we live in a province where dogs are legally removed from their families and killed simply because of the way they look. Perpetuating stereotypes with media hype and moronic politicians looking for a "if it bleeds it leads" headline and the knee-jerk reactionaries who vote for them have brought us Breed Specific Legislation.

What I read in this blog is tabloid schlock. The author is meant to be covering the campaign trail. Do you know anymore about Olivia or the NDP's platform since reading this other than she likes dogs? I don't. So where's the news? Where's the investigative journalism?

When I read this, I tried to step out of my anti-BSL mindset and my pro-pitbull bias. I also tried to step out of my "dog smarts" for a moment and read it as a casual reader. The *real truth* of the casual reader is to step into the shoes of someone who isn't knowledgeable about dogs, perhaps even fearful of dogs.

Pitbulls in particular, rarely get "good news" stories printed. If we read something negative often enough and it is reiterated by the people we elect to govern us, who then make law which reinforce both our unspoken and recognized fears ~ we will believe something like Breed Specific legislation to be valid and just and good. The media bias against pitbulls has been well studied and proven.

We should be able to laugh at ourselves I agree but, t's not as if this was an obviously tongue-in-cheek "cartoon".If he had interjected at some point or ended the article along the lines of "Boy, am I an idiot for being fearful of such a sweet dog" the story could have been funny and self-mocking. And until the laws are changed, I am unable to laugh at/with prejudice and discrimination, particularly when it leads to the death of an innocent who cannot speak for themselves.

A quick and dirty poll of my dog/ non-dog friends found it was received as neither funny nor self-mocking. I conclude that It was a sly, underhanded attempt to further denigrate pitbulls and their owners with a slap-dash of "sarcasm" thrown on as disguise.

Perhaps the Australian experience with Breed Specific Legislation is different given it's lengthy history in your country. All I know is, I don't want it in mine now or ever.

onster
April 17th, 2011, 02:35 PM
it would have been taken as "see, pitbulls are to be feared". .

but I think that would have been the message had Rocky 'proved' to be 'mean', which clearly wasn't the case.

I don't know, I read the article as the reporter sort of making fun of himself and his own preconceptions about the breed, acknowledging that it's wrong to judge a book by its cover but that he can't really help it. I think it's acknowledging a problem in a humorous way. Maybe next reader who goes out and meets a bully breed will remember Rocky and will be more inclined to face their fears, irrational as they may be? :fingerscr

I understand the sensitivity though.

Longblades
April 17th, 2011, 03:08 PM
Well maybe nothing happened as the article said but I'm another who has no problem with it. I think it's cute and realistic in it's portrayal of a person who is nervous of a dog but discovers, a bit unwillingly, that the dog is not so bad.

Oh. I should have simply dittoed Onster. :)

Love4himies
April 17th, 2011, 03:21 PM
Maybe next reader who goes out and meets a bully breed will remember Rocky and will be more inclined to face their fears, irrational as they may be? :fingerscr

I understand the sensitivity though.

Or could remember:

As it was, the teeth were very off-putting. It wasn't that they were bared (although they were) so much as the they were attached to a giant set of muscular jaws.

or

The teeth and the jaws might have been a little less worrisome, if they weren't attached to those wide strong shoulders rippling with taut muscles. But they were. And the shoulders, in turn, were attached to a barrel of a chest, and thick haunches.

or


Rocky, it seemed to me, liked to pump iron.

Or eat it.

Now with people, I make it a habit not to judge a book by its cover.

There was a time in my life when some of my best friends dressed like hoodlums... Each, of course, was a peach.

But with dogs, I'm still stuck on book = cover.

And to my (at least when it comes to canines) judgmental mind, Pit Bulls = trouble.

onster
April 17th, 2011, 03:49 PM
It's obviously a matter of opinion L4H, but to me, what he wrote above is just setting the stage, or explaining why he has that irrational fear. Out of context, sure it sounds bad (very bad), but I would hope that readers would read the whole article and get the 'moral' of the story :shrug:

In fact, I think him using such intense stereotypical/negative descriptors in his writing helps the cause. Contrasted against how happy go lucky the pup actually is/was, it shows you just how much more laughable these stereotypes are :2cents:

onster
April 17th, 2011, 03:51 PM
I do respect your opinion though and can certainly understand why you, and others, are upset :)

hazelrunpack
April 17th, 2011, 04:07 PM
In fact, I think him using such intense stereotypical/negative descriptors in his writing helps the cause. Contrasted against how happy go lucky the pup actually is/was, it shows you just how much more laughable these stereotypes are :2cents:

I was thinking something similar, onster. It's as though he's trying to provoke some thought about the subject...contrasting his ingrained bias with the truth about Rocky. Not sure if he was successful, given the tendencies of people to read uncritically, but that idea did come to mind as I was reading. From the few logged comments that I had the time to read earlier, if that was his intent, a lot of people missed it....

Brandon W
April 17th, 2011, 05:46 PM
Everyone knows my views haha,and yes Rocky has one handsome pitty smile. They are a wonderful breed.

Goldfields
April 17th, 2011, 09:09 PM
Rocky, it seemed to me, liked to pump iron.

Or eat it.



That comment particularly made me laugh. And if he was saying anything similar about my breed I'd be laughing too. Cattle dogs can be described in a bad way, you don't hear about the girl of mine that adopted a lamb, the ones that guard anyone's children, love cats etc., but this guy was funny, and he left me feeling like here is this power house of a dog that's saying look at this beautiful smile, and if you stand still long enough I'll slobber you to death. He didn't finish the article by saying he was relieved he got away unscathed from his encounter. We had a worse guy here with his own TV show who would take every opportunity to say something bad about my breed, even down to doing a segment on a different breed and finishing it by reaching down to pull up his trouser leg, saying that unlike an ACD it won't do this to you. LOL. An itsy bitsy bite mark. :D
3xm, you said

A quick and dirty poll of my dog/ non-dog friends found it was received as neither funny nor self-mocking.

I would suggest that your friends know your stance on this, so that is what I would expect you to say, but I'm an Aussie that has had nothing to do with that breed and who once believed the anti hype about pb's, so isn't it good that I got the impression of it being a friendly , albeit slobbery, smiley dog? It just wasn't bad publicity IMO.

mummummum
April 17th, 2011, 09:16 PM
Well maybe nothing happened as the article said but I'm another who has no problem with it. I think it's cute and realistic in it's portrayal of a person who is nervous of a dog but discovers, a bit unwillingly, that the dog is not so bad.

Oh. I should have simply dittoed Onster. :)

And ...if I hadn't published the photo?

I'm doing a major "shakes head" here...

Step OUT of your dog smart shoes and read it as Fatima-Q-Public.

Goldfields
April 17th, 2011, 10:14 PM
Ummm, have to tell you, I thought the article was funnier than the photo. The article was like "Oh, gee, maybe this isn't as bad as I feared". LOL. And he didn't mind admitting the women showed him up. The owner of this dog was a great ambassador for the breed too, as many smiles as the dog by the sound of things. :)

Brandon W
April 17th, 2011, 10:40 PM
Cattle dogs can be described in a bad way, you don't hear about the girl of mine that adopted a lamb, the ones that guard anyone's children, love cats etc., but this guy was funny, and he left me feeling like here is this power house of a dog that's saying look at this beautiful smile, and if you stand still long enough I'll slobber you to death.

Strong powerful breeds strive to perform and impress those around them specially within their "pack" and show a ton of affection for those that provide and nurture their well being and need for structure.They will always do the most they can to help their pack no matter what.



And ...if I hadn't published the photo?

I'm doing a major "shakes head" here...

Step OUT of your dog smart shoes and read it as Fatima-Q-Public.

Yeah good call no idea who is going to be viewing any photos on here people of all ages/beliefs. Mostly for the kids tho:thumbs up

My bullies doin what they do best,and thats being goofy,cute,and showing off!

Guss(given name) other alias' Fatboy,and or Fat Dizzle.

Don't forget the always stunning and gorgeous Lola.Pretty young then.

Goldfields
April 18th, 2011, 12:10 AM
Strong powerful breeds strive to perform and impress those around them specially within their "pack" and show a ton of affection for those that provide and nurture their well being and need for structure.They will always do the most they can to help their pack no matter what.

Brandon, ACDs are more assertive, more aggressive, probably more protective, less likely to befriend a stranger than a pb, only less formidable ( it might seem to people) due to lack of size/bulk and biting power, which is probably the only reason they've avoided the spotlight that pb's have on them. (although I think some towns in the States may have banned them.)I've had them for 35 years, I think my little pack got to 7 at one stage, so I do know a bit about how packs behave. Having read so much about pb's here I think now that it's bad owners, not bad dogs that is the problem. Never mind, people should lighten up. If an article can make someone laugh instead of think badly about a pb, this is not a bad thing. I'd far rather myself have a big slobbery/smiley dog coming at me than another person's cattle dog with that look in his eye.

Brandon W
April 18th, 2011, 12:40 AM
Brandon, ACDs are more assertive, more aggressive, probably more protective, less likely to befriend a stranger than a pb, only less formidable ( it might seem to people) due to lack of size/bulk and biting power, which is probably the only reason they've avoided the spotlight that pb's have on them. (although I think some towns in the States may have banned them.)I've had them for 35 years, I think my little pack got to 7 at one stage, so I do know a bit about how packs behave. Having read so much about pb's here I think now that it's bad owners, not bad dogs that is the problem. Never mind, people should lighten up. If an article can make someone laugh instead of think badly about a pb, this is not a bad thing. I'd far rather myself have a big slobbery/smiley dog coming at me than another person's cattle dog with that look in his eye.

I do not have experience with that breed so dont know all their characterictic traits but im sure they are more aggressive/protective. They are a working class dog more specific a hearding dog,and biting(nipping) is actually more prone for sure! I was saying strong and powerful as in mentally,and emotionaly not for the physical characteristics. It is bad owners,thats all I can say from reading and personal experience with the breed. As far as im concerned,any dog or animal can be conditioned,or trained to be aggressive/attack. Because after all you(the owner) are the teacher/parent(pack leader) Perfect examples is how Cesar Millan deals with red zone cases in dogs. Dogs will read you 110% quicker than a human reads a dog or another human. There is no way to "bs" a dog. They will read you before you even realize you know what you want to do. A balanced dog will bite an adult before it bites a kid.(Meaning the adult mind is too developed and displays way more bad vibes/signals then the average kid who is taught how to interact with a dog when first meeting it whos brain does not prosses as many receptors to the body an adult would.

Goldfields
April 18th, 2011, 12:52 AM
Well, I don't know pb's at all. Do you think that basically they're benign but can be and are sometimes trained to be aggressive? A balanced dog will bite an adult before it bites a kid? Yes, I agree with that. I had a mother yelling about getting her toddler out from under the table with my first cattle dog and had to tell her if she didn't shut up, she'd get bitten herself. LOL. If that dog had thought her a threat to the toddler she'd have been in trouble. The child was not! That dog adored kids.

Brandon W
April 18th, 2011, 01:01 AM
Rocky, it seemed to me, liked to pump iron.

Or eat it.

Now with people, I make it a habit not to judge a book by its cover.

There was a time in my life when some of my best friends dressed like hoodlums... Each, of course, was a peach.

But with dogs, I'm still stuck on book = cover.

And to my (at least when it comes to canines) judgmental mind, Pit Bulls = trouble.[/QUOTE]


No he IS the iron....and the columnist is right I guess,cause the cover thats on the book of media biases has his picture on it....and I do believe there is a salavaiting Rocky sitting beside him with sharp long teeth, and evil stare.:highfive:

Brandon W
April 18th, 2011, 01:09 AM
Well, I don't know pb's at all. Do you think that basically they're ?benign? but can be and are sometimes trained to be aggressive? A balanced dog will bite an adult before it bites a kid? Yes, I agree with that. I had a mother yelling about getting her toddler out from under the table with my first cattle dog and had to tell her if she didn't shut up, she'd get bitten herself. LOL. If that dog had thought her a threat to the toddler she'd have been in trouble. The child was not! That dog adored kids.

Oh yes of course their qualities are abused by people who have a lack of better judgement. Which in turn feeds the medias views.Im not saying the breed is innocent. Ill compare it like this. A gun is a gun wether its a .22 calibre or a .45 caliber. Either way you are not going to want to be shot. Therefore a dog is a dog wether its a teacup or a "horse" you are not going to want to be attacked. Yes your PREFERENCE would be to not be shot/attacked by the biggest gun/dog,but that is what it is......a preference. In the end the outcome is the same and this needs to be realized before more damage is done.

Love4himies
April 18th, 2011, 07:01 AM
I guess this debate could go on forever. We don't know what was going through the author's head, we can only go by what he wrote, period.

I didn't read anything in that article that did pitbulls any favours. Some people may have thought the tone of the article was humorous, but that is an assumption on their part, no facts to contrary. I didn't read where the author thought that Rocky was a gentle, loving dog :shrug:. He talked about barring teeth, and pitbulls = trouble, and that he was happy the owner had a substantial leash :frustrated:. As mx3 stated, John Q Public is reading this article, not necessarily those who are doggy smart and realize that Rocky is a sweet and lovable dog.

Even if we assume the author meant for it to be humorous, is it really funny? I don't think so. Had the author been writing about African Americans and comparing them to muggers, or Muslims as terrorists, or Catholic Priests as pedophiles, then it wouldn't be so funny and we would be calling the author a racist and demanding the newspaper retract the column.

Pit bulls here in Ontario are being unfairly judged, they are assumed guilty by their looks, not on their actions. Many families have had to experience unnecessary grief due to our discriminatory laws. Military families (and others) who are posted into Ontario are having to say goodbye to beloved family pets, not because they had done anything wrong but because they are a pitbull. Pitbulls are being put to death, not for what they have done but by who their parents are.

If the author wanted to portray his biased thoughts on pitbulls being trouble, then he should have made it clear in the article and given Rocky the fair description of being a sweet and lovable dog.

I just fail to see any humor in this at all.

Melinda
April 18th, 2011, 07:41 AM
my beagle did eat iron, and flack (stuff that fall off when your welding),...she was operated on once for it.

hazelrunpack
April 18th, 2011, 07:54 AM
Oh yes of course their qualities are abused by people who have a lack of better judgement. Which in turn feeds the medias views.Im not saying the breed is innocent. Ill compare it like this. A gun is a gun wether its a .22 calibre or a .45 caliber. Either way you are not going to want to be shot. Therefore a dog is a dog wether its a teacup or a "horse" you are not going to want to be attacked. Yes your PREFERENCE would be to not be shot/attacked by the biggest gun/dog,but that is what it is......a preference. In the end the outcome is the same and this needs to be realized before more damage is done.
A strange analogy, but I can see it. In both cases, you have to worry about the person behind it all--has the dog been trained properly? And who has the gun? The difference is that guns don't shoot themselves, but dogs need proper guidance so that they don't bite. A good gun won't go bad if it doesn't get the proper training, but a dog might. Responsible ownership is key for safety in both situations, however...regardless of the caliber of the gun or the size of the dog.

erykah1310
April 18th, 2011, 10:03 AM
Good guns also wont go bad from lack of socialization, good guns (and bad ones) have to be locked up at all times. Even the best bully not socialized and always locked up not excercised could very well go bad.

I'm not a fan of the analogy, a gun is incapable of acting on its own with out direct physical stimiuli, where a dog of any breed does act on its own but how it acts owes a lot to the person behind it with physical and mental influence, but I get your point on the matter.

Brandon W
April 18th, 2011, 10:47 AM
Good guns also wont go bad from lack of socialization, good guns (and bad ones) have to be locked up at all times. Even the best bully not socialized and always locked up not excercised could very well go bad.

I'm not a fan of the analogy, a gun is incapable of acting on its own with out direct physical stimiuli, where a dog of any breed does act on its own but how it acts owes a lot to the person behind it with physical and mental influence, but I get your point on the matter.


I was using it as a rough analogy of it. I know its not the same,a gun is an object not a mind. I ment it in the sense of the size of the bullet more then the gun itself.

Shaykeija
April 20th, 2011, 10:55 PM
So glad to see so many different views.....Great thread

Luvmypitgirls
April 26th, 2011, 12:47 AM
I guess this debate could go on forever. We don't know what was going through the author's head, we can only go by what he wrote, period.

I didn't read anything in that article that did pitbulls any favours. Some people may have thought the tone of the article was humorous, but that is an assumption on their part, no facts to contrary. I didn't read where the author thought that Rocky was a gentle, loving dog :shrug:. He talked about barring teeth, and pitbulls = trouble, and that he was happy the owner had a substantial leash :frustrated:. As mx3 stated, John Q Public is reading this article, not necessarily those who are doggy smart and realize that Rocky is a sweet and lovable dog.

Even if we assume the author meant for it to be humorous, is it really funny? I don't think so. Had the author been writing about African Americans and comparing them to muggers, or Muslims as terrorists, or Catholic Priests as pedophiles, then it wouldn't be so funny and we would be calling the author a racist and demanding the newspaper retract the column.

Pit bulls here in Ontario are being unfairly judged, they are assumed guilty by their looks, not on their actions. Many families have had to experience unnecessary grief due to our discriminatory laws. Military families (and others) who are posted into Ontario are having to say goodbye to beloved family pets, not because they had done anything wrong but because they are a pitbull. Pitbulls are being put to death, not for what they have done but by who their parents are.

If the author wanted to portray his biased thoughts on pitbulls being trouble, then he should have made it clear in the article and given Rocky the fair description of being a sweet and lovable dog.

I just fail to see any humor in this at all.

I couldn't have said it better myself therefore I am quoting you!:thumbs up

Love4himies
April 26th, 2011, 06:55 AM
I couldn't have said it better myself therefore I am quoting you!:thumbs up

Awwww, thanks LMPG. I just hate the pitbull ban here, it just turns my stomach :cry::(

babyrocky1
June 7th, 2011, 08:37 PM
Is Rocky's owner a member here mx3?
LOL, just scrolling through posts, I didn't know this was here LOL.. Yes, I'm a member, and yes, that's my Rockstar with Olivia Chow, seems we can get into trouble just answering the door.. Olivia has known Rocky for years which would have been obvious to Mr. Cudmore who is supposedly a "political journalist" he has since answered our complaints about this article with something like, What we should have gotten out of the article was that despite the reputation of the breed, Rocky gave Kisses not bites.. I thought, TOO bad that's not what YOU wrote.. but I am over it now.
It as actually broadcasted over CBC radio, nationally.. and i am in the background going "kisses Rocky, Kisses" and to think there was a federal Election going on and still the "Pit Bull" gets the coverage!
However, it obviously went ok for Olivia and Rocky is claiming full responsibility for the "Orange Wave" LOL
PS.. yes, I think it's funny now but when I read the part that says, Rocky bared his teeth, which of course NEVER happened and NEVER would.. I was VERY upset.

babyrocky1
June 7th, 2011, 09:23 PM
Same here Melinda , I read it twice , saw nothing wrong with the article. :shrug: Then again , you always have people feeling attacked , screaming bloody murder as soon as "Pitbulls" are mention.



quoted from the article :

"He forced his way out the door and into the hall"

not too much control there.
UMMM, FACT, I opened the door a crack because my gate on the door was missing, (long boring story) I was Shocked to see a man standing there with a recording devise, wouldn't you be a little suprised???, I opened the door further to see Olivia and one of my neighbours when Rocky slipped out into my hallway - a hall way that is common space to all of my neighbours who are all FINE with him being out there- our building, like most, is a security building where one lets in a visitor by the telephone.. I was not alerted to anyone being allowed into our building.. CUDMORE did not have permission to be there and certainly not to record me. Rocky was "under control" and was only excited to have company!

babyrocky1
June 7th, 2011, 09:38 PM
trying to post a pic, everything has changed since last i did this!

Love4himies
June 8th, 2011, 07:44 AM
Awwww, what a beautiful boy :cloud9:

mikischo
June 8th, 2011, 08:09 AM
Awe, that is just too, too adorable. The "Rockstar" is a gorgeous boy.:lovestruck:

Melinda
June 8th, 2011, 08:37 AM
*L* I love the picture, for some reason it reminds me of the politicians that kiss the babies *L*

chico2
June 8th, 2011, 04:28 PM
A great pic of Rocky the politician,a beautiful boy:lovestruck: