bendyfoot
June 11th, 2009, 11:33 AM
I've been reading some discussions elsewhere about BSL, media reports on dog attacks, etc etc...
1. I decided to contact the city here for records of reported dog bites/attacks, specifically the nature of the attack and the breeds involved. I was told it would mean me proceeding with an ATIP request...is that normal?
2. If you google "dog attack" you almost always come up with page after page of stories involving pitbull-like dogs. Of course there are non-bullies involved in some stories but they're few and far between. I know that it's very easy to point a finger at the media and blame them for unfair overrepresetnation of certain breeds in dog attack stories (because it's "sexy", to use a term recently used in the political spectrum). I have no doubt that this is the case. But now I'm wondering...
how many dog attacks/bites go completely unreported because of the breed involved? I would be very interested in a study where people were shown pictures of different dog breeds and asked, "if this dog bit you, but not hard enough to break skin, would you report it?" You could also ask "if it chased you/bit and broke skin/barked at you/you saw it running loose in your neighbourhood etc. etc." I'm very willing to bet that breeds commonly perceived as non-aggressive or non-"dangerous" i.e. labs, goldens, toy breeds etc. would get a Get Out of Jail Free Card from most people. It's probably not just the media's fault that bullies are getting a bad rap...
what do others think? has anyone seen any evaluations of this kind? Just curious, it's been bothering me for a while...
1. I decided to contact the city here for records of reported dog bites/attacks, specifically the nature of the attack and the breeds involved. I was told it would mean me proceeding with an ATIP request...is that normal?
2. If you google "dog attack" you almost always come up with page after page of stories involving pitbull-like dogs. Of course there are non-bullies involved in some stories but they're few and far between. I know that it's very easy to point a finger at the media and blame them for unfair overrepresetnation of certain breeds in dog attack stories (because it's "sexy", to use a term recently used in the political spectrum). I have no doubt that this is the case. But now I'm wondering...
how many dog attacks/bites go completely unreported because of the breed involved? I would be very interested in a study where people were shown pictures of different dog breeds and asked, "if this dog bit you, but not hard enough to break skin, would you report it?" You could also ask "if it chased you/bit and broke skin/barked at you/you saw it running loose in your neighbourhood etc. etc." I'm very willing to bet that breeds commonly perceived as non-aggressive or non-"dangerous" i.e. labs, goldens, toy breeds etc. would get a Get Out of Jail Free Card from most people. It's probably not just the media's fault that bullies are getting a bad rap...
what do others think? has anyone seen any evaluations of this kind? Just curious, it's been bothering me for a while...