Gibbons
February 6th, 2008, 12:40 PM
So the rescue that I'm fostering through seems to be small and not-well known. I'd never heard of them and I've been searching rescues for ages once I decided to foster. I got in touch with them through another rescue (who gave my name to another rescue who gave my name to this rescue). Is that standard? If that's NOT standard, then I wonder if they're doing other things in a not-standard way.
My main concern is that the previous' owners sister has started calling the rescue and harassing them with threats to sue to get the dogs back. She wants them back in March. The previous owner is in hospital.. he gets released to go home in March. They absolutely must NOT go back - I don't care how badly the sister wants them; anyone who can stand by and watch this happen to any animal is not a person who should ever get what she wants, IMO.
But.. what is the process for removing dogs from abusive or neglectful situations? If the owner signed something releasing ownership- can the sister get them back? If the neighbour "took" them without permission (the neighbour brought them in), could they get them back again? Are there lawsuits that can be brought against a rescue? Is this something I need to worry about?
More to the point, is this something that can screw up a potential adoptive family? I know a couple has applied to adopt them. When I called the rescue to let them know the name of the person applying so they could watch for it, they freaked out that anyone was interested, thinking it was "too much of a coincidence" that the sister wants them, and now this couple wants them too. I don't think this is a coincidence, and I've put tons of effort into getting them adopted. Is there a chance they'd dismiss this woman and her application just due to "coincidence"? I'm trying REALLY hard not to start calling them and demanding answers to all these questions in case I'm wrong, but I'm really worried.
My main concern is that the previous' owners sister has started calling the rescue and harassing them with threats to sue to get the dogs back. She wants them back in March. The previous owner is in hospital.. he gets released to go home in March. They absolutely must NOT go back - I don't care how badly the sister wants them; anyone who can stand by and watch this happen to any animal is not a person who should ever get what she wants, IMO.
But.. what is the process for removing dogs from abusive or neglectful situations? If the owner signed something releasing ownership- can the sister get them back? If the neighbour "took" them without permission (the neighbour brought them in), could they get them back again? Are there lawsuits that can be brought against a rescue? Is this something I need to worry about?
More to the point, is this something that can screw up a potential adoptive family? I know a couple has applied to adopt them. When I called the rescue to let them know the name of the person applying so they could watch for it, they freaked out that anyone was interested, thinking it was "too much of a coincidence" that the sister wants them, and now this couple wants them too. I don't think this is a coincidence, and I've put tons of effort into getting them adopted. Is there a chance they'd dismiss this woman and her application just due to "coincidence"? I'm trying REALLY hard not to start calling them and demanding answers to all these questions in case I'm wrong, but I'm really worried.
