Barbsy
February 3rd, 2008, 05:34 PM
Being a new member, is it a requirement to post so many threads before being able to upload a picture?:confused:
|
||||
Posting imagesBarbsy February 3rd, 2008, 05:34 PM Being a new member, is it a requirement to post so many threads before being able to upload a picture?:confused: Winston February 3rd, 2008, 05:36 PM Barbsy I am not sure what the requirement is ? I thought someone said 5 posts? Welcome anyway....cant wait to see you fur family. Cindy hazelrunpack February 3rd, 2008, 05:39 PM I think somewhere someone guessed there was a 3 post minimum :D --are your attachments activated now, Barbsy? :fingerscr Barbsy February 3rd, 2008, 06:02 PM At the moment, it tells me that I can't post attachments:sad: Blathach February 3rd, 2008, 07:16 PM Welcome to Pets.ca Barbsy. Due to the inappropriate pictures posted by spammers, the Admin of the board decided to implement a minimum post and a waiting period before being able to post pictures. If you would like immediate access to posting pictures you can email Marko (the Admin) with your username at marko@pets.ca We look forward to seeing pictures of your fur family. Thank you. Your friendly neighborhood Admin and Mod team Frenchy February 3rd, 2008, 07:24 PM Someone explain this to me because I don't get how come new members can't post pictures before some amount of posts but I did see some spammers post porn pictures on their first post ! :confused: diandpat February 3rd, 2008, 07:27 PM Frenchy, I think it is because of the porn pictures that they have implemented this new "minimum posts requirement". At least that is how I understand Blathach's message. Makes sense really since there was one night where some porn spammers went crazy on this board. Just have a wait a little longer to see people's furkid pics, that's all :lovestruck: hazelrunpack February 3rd, 2008, 07:30 PM Someone explain this to me because I don't get how come new members can't post pictures before some amount of posts but I did see some spammers post porn pictures on their first post ! :confused: I think the only thing they can control would be attachments--I think you can still imbed links from a photo-sharing site like photobucket :confused: Frenchy February 3rd, 2008, 07:41 PM Frenchy, I think it is because of the porn pictures that they have implemented this new "minimum posts requirement". At least that is how I understand Blathach's message. Yes I know , but spammers are still able to post pictures (porn) on their first post ! It happened yesterday or was it Friday ? So the new thing about not being able to post pics on the first post works for newbies but not for spammers. Blathach February 3rd, 2008, 07:43 PM I think the only thing they can control would be attachments--I think you can still imbed links from a photo-sharing site like photobucket :confused: This is absolutely correct. diandpat February 3rd, 2008, 08:00 PM THERE WAS PORN ON FRIDAY...DARN, missed it! :laughing: Don't know how that happened. mona_b February 3rd, 2008, 08:01 PM But what I have noticed about the 2 porno poster(:rolleyes:) is that they posted from the sites.Which you can copy and paste.It wasn't from a photosharing like photobucket. The second porno poster(you saw that too Frenchy)had at least 60 sites....:eek: Frenchy February 3rd, 2008, 08:04 PM THERE WAS PORN ON FRIDAY...DARN, missed it! :laughing: Don't know how that happened. I'll call you next time :laughing: mona_b February 3rd, 2008, 08:08 PM I'll call you next time :laughing: Your bad.....:eek:................LOL Frenchy February 3rd, 2008, 08:18 PM Your bad.....:eek:................LOL Thanks , don't tell anyone :laughing: mona_b February 3rd, 2008, 08:31 PM I won't.....;) | ||||